Anchor Collection to Legal Theory
Evidence collection should follow legal theory, not the other way around. Each claim type requires different proof priorities and audience framing.
When teams collect without theory, they accumulate volume without relevance.
Preserve Source Integrity
Capture original links, account identifiers, timestamps, and method notes. Keep originals read-only and annotate copies. Include ownership documents and chain-of-title summaries where relevant.
Pair misuse proof with conservative harm evidence such as customer confusion logs or partner complaints.
Package by Audience
Create tailored versions for platforms, counterparties, and potential litigation. Keep one indexed source library so versions remain consistent.
Run quality checks for missing dates, broken references, or unsupported assertions before submission.
Key takeaways
- Anchor evidence collection to a defined legal theory.
- Preserve source material and metadata with integrity controls.
- Prove rights ownership alongside misuse facts.
- Maintain audience-specific evidence packets from a single source of truth.
General informational content only. Enforcement evidence requirements differ by platform, claim type, and jurisdiction.